2009.08.24 -- Editorial

2009.04.23 -- Editorial

This is part of a growing trend toward genetic profiling that would ultimately declare an individual a “criminal” based on DNA from the point of birth. Insurance companies and the medical community want to get a hold on genetic engineering as the dollar signs are rolling around in their eyeballs. One more reason why “universtal healthcare” and government control and regulation of individual health issues must be stopped dead in its tracks.

No doubt about it. The Neo-Nazism of George W. Bush has spilled over into the Obama administration via his legacy of John Roberts and the Supreme Court. Supreme Court appointments are for life, however, the Congress can and should initiate impeachment proceeding against the members who voted in favor of what really is nothing less than the total dissolutions of the constitution and the right to due process.

2009.03.17 -- Editorial

I see today that some in government are ready to go after AIG executives who have received large bonuses after the company got its multi-billion dollar bailout money. This is a multi-layered observation. How is it that the big guys got bailed out while the little guys are left to drown without a lifeboat? That's the tough one because if you are to believe what has been said about it all, then you must believe that some intervention was required to save the world from total economic disaster. Then again, couldn't the geniuses have seen it coming to begin with?

So, the big shots are saying they're going to get back those bonuses because the government now owns eighty percent of the company! Whoops. Isn't the "nationalization" of the banks and the subsequent micromanagement by government what everyone was trying to avoid in the first place? Even I understand that legal contracts cannot so easily be broken. Or, is all this banter really just a way to shift focus while showing some "positive" action in order to encourage confidence and stability?

And, how much of the overall problem is being caused by the integration of the world markets in the long term after the initial approval of Nafta and Gafta? Again, my lack of genius may be entering, but it seems to me that this is the first really major economic setback, for the United States, since world markets have become so completely entwined.

The conclusion of the matter? A bunch of crooks probably did know what was going on, they got rich, the crooked politicos looked the other way, the rich got richer, the poor got poorer, and that Madoff guy got busted and is going to jail. Had to have at least one scapegoat in it all...give him some more rope.

2009.02.10 -- Editorial

Google's first evil was to pay for advertising on personal websites based on click thru instead of per view. Who needs to see the Coca Cola website as long as they are reminded to go to the fridge and pop a can?

Now Google has "Latitude." The new service that allows you to invite people to track your whereabouts using your cellphone and GPS. Not good. The common good of the people is being violated. The loss of privacy is being cultivated to a younger generation who easily accepts what has already been shoved down their throats...i.e. there is no privacy on the Internet. Well, maybe not so true.

Here is where government regulation perhaps should step in and end this type of invasive activity. We all loose because a few juviniles and mommy gods who want to track their little darlings everywhere. Then they grow up thinking that is the way it is supposed to be.

I will begin the process of removing Google from my website in the coming weeks. Once I have the time and get started revamping in general, Google will be removed. The company of "do no evil," does nothing but.

2009.01.22 -- Editorial

I'm certainly one amoung those who thought it wouldn't happen in my lifetime. I cannot object based on race, but, I can't condone based on race either. One editorial I read immediately after the election conceded that black folks certainly could be excused for voting based on color...this time. After all, white folks appeared to have voted based on politics and that's how all American's should vote. Obama's election, we all know, is the major culminating factor of the civil rights movement. So be it.

Unfortunately, however, the overshadowing issue of race could be the smokescreen to advance politics and agendas that otherwise wouldn't go unnoticed. The election is over. The historic event has been consummated. Even already Obama has shown some negative leanings. Work programs are fine, but not full blown socialism. Sonjay Gupta? A very questionable choice, could've been made by W based on the "importance of symbolism." Then again, could be Obama has facilitated an opportunity to regain constitutional democratic perspective in spite of symbolism. If so, he will have to be pro-active where the Surgeon General is concerned. And Hillary? Hillary has made deliberate overtures that could also have been a part of W's Neo-Nazism.

In all it must be said. Reverse discrimination, and discrimination based on other arbitrary factors, particularly in the age of genetic engineering, is still just that...discrimination. It would be a terrible tragedy indeed if the "first black president" of the United States turns out to be the one who undermines the civil rights of all.

We shall see. I will be here making observations and offering criticism of Mr. Obama till my last breath. I have despised George Bush with all my living breath...but it doesn't mean I automatically support the politics and agendas of President Obama. All in all, however, I'd say he's off to a good start.

Congratulations.

2008.12.25 -- Editorial

2008.11.25 -- Editorial

2008.011.13 -- Editorial

This photo of now President Elect Obama is when he first appeared in Huntsville at the Heritage Club to campaign in July of 2007. Looking rather presidential right from the beginning...

As noted above, my time is limited right now so I won't attempt to say all the things that you must have already thought by now anyway. Instead I am running the article below again because it is more relevent than ever in light of the global economic meltdown. Obviously, Obama ran a campaign that didn't loose the election. Now the question will be can he run the country without loosing the constitution.

2008.07.09 -- Editorial